Patna High CourtCR. REV./983/2018rejected

Anil Kumar Mehta v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-24Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL REVISION No.983 of 2018 In CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.901 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2016 Thana- AMBA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Anil Kumar Mehta Son of Bhimsen Mehta Under the Guardianship of his Natural father, resident of village- Chilhki More, Amba, P.S- Kutumba, Distt. Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Birendra Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sri Bipin Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-07-2019 Perused the report sent by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Spl. Judge, Aurangabad, from which it transpires that out of eight witnesses, only one witness has been examined at the trial. The petitioner has been declared as juvenile and is an accused of the offence, punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He is being tried before the Children's Court, on the basis of the report of the Juvenile Justice Board that he had mental and physical capacity to commit the offence and to understand the consequences of the offence. It also appears that there are three criminal cases pending against him of serious nature, two of which are under Sections 302 and 395 of the

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.983 of 2018(14) dt.24-07-2019 2/2 Indian Penal Code. This is to be noted that this criminal revision application has been filed against the order dated 18.12.2017, passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, rejecting the petitioner's application for his release on bail. Considering the nature of the allegation against the petitioner and the fact that he has criminal antecedent of his involvement in the crimes of serious nature, I do not find any infirmity in the impugned order.

This application is accordingly rejected.

Let the trial be expedited and concluded within a period of six months from the date of receipt/communication of a copy of the present order.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) HR/- U T