← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/849/2020disposed

Dr. Manan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2022-07-05Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 849 of 2020 ====================================================== Dr Manan Prasad Son of Late Gorakh Prasad, Resident of Village-Surwal, P.O. and P.S. Ziradei, District-Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, New Secretariat, Patna.

2.

Director, State Health Society, Patna.

3.

Additional Director, State Health Society, Patna. 4.

The Civil Surgeon cum Member Secretary, District Health Society, Banka. 5.

Incharge Medical Officer Referral Hospital Kataria, Banka. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr Mukul Prasad, Advocate For State of Bihar :

Mr Pankaj Kumar, SC XII Mr Kamlesh Kishore, AC to SC XII For Health Society :

M/s K K Sinha, Shashi Shekhar, Advocates ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 05-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents.

Claiming to be an Ayush doctor, the petitioner submits that he went on leave on account of sudden illness of his mother where after he has not been permitted to rejoin. Submission is that the Deputy Secretary -cumIncharge Human Resource, State Health Society, Bihar, vide letter dated 08.02.2019, has written to the Civil Surgeon -cumMember Secretary of the District Health Society, Banka (Respondent No 4) forwarding the petitioner's application for

Patna High Court CWJC No.849 of 2020(3) dt.05-07-2022 2/2 necessary action. No decision has been taken by the Civil Surgeon -cum- Member Secretary of the District Health Society (Respondent No 4).

In view of the limited grievance, this writ petition need not be kept pending as no adjudication is called for, in view of the fact that a final decision has to be taken by Respondent No 4.

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the submissions, advanced by the petitioner's counsel, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Respondent No 4 to take appropriate decision in accordance with law based on the records, expeditiously and preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

Writ petition stands disposed of.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- U