Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Mehta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85404 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-183 Year-2019 Thana- DHAMDAHA District- Purnia ====================================================== RAVI KUMAR @ RAVI MEHTA, aged about 21 years, (Male), Son of Shivakant Singh @ Shivakant Mehta, Resident of Village - Puraini, P.S.- Puraini, Distt - Madhepura, At present Resident of Kodhipani Tola Dhamdaha, P.S.- Dhamdaha, Distt - Purnea.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Adv, Mr. Dhananjay Nath Tiwari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary(APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 413, 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation is recovery of stolen motorcycle from the possession of the petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 13.06.2019.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85404 of 2019(2) dt.08-01-2020 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, in connection with Dhamdaha P.S. Case No. 183 of of 2019, subject to conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T