Lal Mahammad Mian @ Anil Mian @ Lalmohammad Miya v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88892 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-518 Year-2025 Thana- BETTIAH CITY District- West Champaran ====================================================== Lal Mahammad Mian @ Anil Mian @ Lalmohammad Miya S/o Late Alijan Mian Resident of Village- Chhota Puliya / Chhota Tuniya, P.S - Manuapul, District - West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sarvesh Kashyap, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Bettiah Town P.S. Case No. 518 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the police received secret information that two persons are coming from GMCH on a stolen bike. At 01:45 PM, a bike was intercepted, and two persons were apprehended; one is Mojaheed Mian, and the second is Lal Mahammad Mian (the petitioner).

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88892 of 2025(2) dt.08-01-2026 2/3 petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was only a pillion rider on the said bike. He has taken a lift from Mojaheed Mian and had no knowledge regarding the status of the bike. It was subsequently found that the bike was a stolen one and a case has also been lodged regarding the stealing of the said bike. He further submits that although the petitioner was apprehended on the bike, he was merely a pillion rider and he had no knowledge of the offence. It is also submitted that the case is triable by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 22.10.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of three cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88892 of 2025(2) dt.08-01-2026 3/3 Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Bettiah Town P.S. Case No. 518 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T