Janardan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3279 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.
Janardan Prasad Son of Sri Bhola Prasad, Resident of Village- Mahuari Naugarh, P.S.- Aurangabad (M) and District- Aurangabad (Bihar). 2.
Ranjit Kumar Singh, Son of Sri Naresh Singh, Resident of Village- Nehuta, P.O.- Rajoi, P.S.- Aurangabad (M) and District- Aurangabad (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary cum Principal Secretary, Department of Co-operative, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Chief Election Officer, Bihar State Election Authority, Bihar, Patna. 3.
The Registrar, Bihar Co-operative Society, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.
The Joint Secretary, Bihar State Election Authority, Bihar, Patna. 5.
The District Election Officer (C.S.) cum District Magistrate, Aurangabad. 6.
The Deputy Development Commissioner cum Nodal Officer (C.S.), Aurangabad.
7.
The Deputy Election Officer, Aurangabad.
8.
The District Co-operative Officer, Aurangabad. 9.
The Block Development Officer cum Assistant Election Officer (C.S.), Block Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad.
10.
The Assistant Registrar, Circle Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad. 11.
Naugarh Primary Agriculture Cooperative Society (PACS), Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vyas Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Uday Shankar Sharan Singh, GP-19 For the Election Authority :
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-10-2023 Mr. Vyas Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that by the efflux of time, the present writ application has become infructuous and, as such, he seeks permission to withdraw the writ application.
2. Learned counsel for the State and the State Election
Patna High Court CWJC No.3279 of 2020(4) dt.03-10-2023 2/2 Authority are present.
3. In view thereof, the present writ application stands dismissed, as having become infructuous.
(Harish Kumar, J) uday/- U