← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./83639/2019bail granted

Jhagaru Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2019-12-17Mr. Justice Prakash Chandra Jaiswal3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83639 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-303 Year-2018 Thana- MOTIHARI TOWN District- East Champaran ====================================================== Jhagaru Prasad Son of Rameshwar Prasad Resident of Village- Surha, P.S.- Motihari Mufassil, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER 17-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 303 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a), 36, 41(1) of Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act-2016.

210 lts. of Nepali Saufi wine is said to have been recovered from a Tata Indigo Car and co-accused Shami Akhtar was apprehended from the said car and from his possession, one

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83639 of 2019(2) dt.17-12-2019 2/3 loaded country made pistol was recovered while other accused managed to escape. Apprehended accused disclosed the name of the petitioner as his fleeing accomplice in the occurrence. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no incriminating article has been recovered from conscious physical possession of the petitioner. He has no concern either with the seized article or with the vehicle in question. There is nothing cogent incriminating material on record indicating the complicity of the petitioner in the occurrence barring the disclosure made by apprehended accused Shami Akhtar due to animosity. There is violation of Section 100 Cr.P.C. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been languishing in custody since 19.11.2019. Co-accused Shami Akhtar has been enlarged on bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 08.10.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 62829 of 2018. On the other hand, learned APP opposed the bail prayer of the petitioner.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 9th Addl. Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, Excise Motihari, East Champaran in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83639 of 2019(2) dt.17-12-2019 3/3 connection with Town P.S. Case No. 303 of 2018. (Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J) rohit/- U T