Pappu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 90714 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2020 Thana- KHAIRA District- Jamui ====================================================== Pappu Yadav Son of Satyendra Yadav Resident of Village- Raipura, P.S.- Khaira, District- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Zainul Abedin, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 155 of 2020 instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 427, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that accused persons named in the F.I.R., including the petitioner, assaulted informant and his other family members due to which informant sustained head injury. It is alleged that other co-accused persons snatched earring of wife of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submitted that the alleged occurrence

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 90714 of 2025(2) dt.13-01-2026 2/3 took place due to destroy the NAD. He further submits that informant and petitioner are close agent and land dispute is going on between the parties. In course of altercation informant fell down and sustained head injury. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 18.05.2025 and has two criminal antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of injury as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 155 of 2020, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 90714 of 2025(2) dt.13-01-2026 3/3 (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) manish/- U T