← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3926/2026bail granted

Ramchandrar Yadav @ Ramchandra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-04Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3926 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2025 Thana- BIHRA District- Saharsa ====================================================== Ramchandrar Yadav @ Ramchandra Yadav, Son of Mahanand Yadav, Resident of Village - Saharba, Ward No. 17, P.S. - Bihra, District - Saharsa, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Amarnath Jha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Md. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Bihra P.S. Case No.88 of 2025, dated.21.04.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 329(3), 303(2), 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per allegation, due to land dispute, the Petitioner and other co-accused have assaulted the informant and other family members.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that due to land dispute altercation

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3926 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/3 took place between the informant side and the Petitioner's side leading to injury on both the sides and there is case and counter case between the them. He also submits that the alleged injury caused is simple in nature.

5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

8. Considering the simple nature of injury and case and counter case, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned Court below, in connection with Bihra P.S. Case No.88 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S 2023, and on the following conditions:

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3926 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 3/3 (i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.

(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Jitendra Kumar, J.) Chandan/- U T