Alauddin Beg v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.284 of 2019 ====================================================== Alauddin Beg Son of Late Sadik Beg, Resident of Village-Sikandra, Post Officer-Sikandra, Police Station-Sikandra, District-Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
The District Magistrate, Jamui, 3.
The Circle Officer, Anchal-Sikandra, District-Jamui 4.
The Inspector General of Registration, Bihar, Patna. 5.
The Assistant Inspector General of Registration, Bihar, Patna. 6.
The Sub Registrar, Registration, Registry Officer-Jamui. 7.
Azhar Saddique, Son of Late Hassan Imam, Resident of Village-Sikandra, Post Officer-Sikandra, District-Jamui.
8.
Hassan Saddique, Son of Late Mazhar Saddique, Resident of VillageSikandra, Post Office-Sikandra, District-Jamui. 9.
Athar Saddique @ Manzar Siddique, Son of Late Mazhar Saddique, Resident of Village-Sikandra, Post Office- Sikandra, District-Jamui. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Abdul Wadood For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Anil Kr. Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 07-01-2020 The petition filed on 03.01.2019 is listed for hearing for the first time today before the Court.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
Petitioner has prayed for the following relief/s: "That this writ application is being filed in the
Patna High Court CWJC No.284 of 2019(2) dt.07-01-2020 2/3 Form of Public Interest Litigation for a direction/directions to the Respondents to take action against the private Respondents who have illegally and fraudulently sold the land under Mauza-Sikandra, Khata No. 454, Plot No. 2394 Area 0.05 which belongs to Bihar Sarkar."
After the matter was heard for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner shall be content if a direction is issued to the concerned respondents to consider and decide the representation, which the petitioner shall be making afresh within a period of four weeks from today. Learned counsel for the State states that upon receipt of such request, if any, the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law, expeditiously and positively within a period of three months from the date of receipt thereof. Equally, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such alternative remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law.
We are hopeful that as and when petitioner takes recourse to such remedies, as are otherwise available in law, before the appropriate forum, the same shall be dealt with, in accordance with law and with reasonable dispatch.
Patna High Court CWJC No.284 of 2019(2) dt.07-01-2020 3/3 The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) K.C.Jha/- U