← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./85963/2019dismissed

Nand Kishore Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2020-09-25Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

(FROM RESIDENTIAL OFFICE VIA VIDEO APPLICATION) CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85963 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-156 Year-2019 Thana- CHARPOKHARI District- Bhojpur ====================================================== NAND KISHORE SINGH Son of Subhag Yadav Resident of VillageSemraon, P.S.- Charpokhari, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shiv Prasad Gupta, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Choubey Jawahar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 25-09-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner in the present case is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No.156 of 2019 registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner and the informant are next-door neighbours and due to land dispute the name of the petitioner has been brought in this case. He also submits that in the First Information Report there is no specific allegation of assault against this petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85963 of 2019(5) dt.25-09-2020 2/2 Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case wherein there is a specific allegation against this petitioner that he has assaulted the son of the informant by an iron rod on the head causing injury to the son of the informant and further that three cases are there against the petitioner as criminal antecedent, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The prayer is refused. In case the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, his prayer for regular bail shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order of this Court. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U T Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.