← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./85688/2019allowed

Jayram Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

2020-02-17Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85688 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-99 Year-2018 Thana- BUNIYAD GANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Jayram Manjhi Son of Lalu Manjhi, Resident of Village - Manpur, Suryapokhar, Bhuian toli, P.S.- Buniyadganj, District - Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Saxena For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Buniyadganj P.S. Case No.99 of 2018 registered for offence punishable under section 30 (a) (d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The police on secret information conducted a raid and recovered 02 litres of mahua wine from the house of the petitioner.

Looking to the quantity of liquor and the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed and he, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85688 of 2019(3) dt.17-02-2020 2/2 Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Excise, Gaya in connection with Buniyadganj P.S. Case No.99 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. If the petitioner is found involved in similar type of allegation in future, the prosecution will have liberty to file an application for cancellation of his bail bond.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T