Uday Shankar Kumar @ Uday Shankar Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.92051 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-230 Year-2025 Thana- NAUHATTA District- Rohtas ====================================================== Uday Shankar Kumar @ Uday Shankar Prasad S/O Late Baid Nath Prasad Resident of Village- Dara Nagar, P.S.- Nauhtta, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Supriya kumari w/o Uday Shankar Kumar D/o Chattu Sah vill and PO Barao Kala P S Akori Gola DIst Rohtas ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shashi Kant For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Zainul Abedin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-02-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned APP for the State, and the learned counsel for the informant.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Nauhatta P.S. Case No. 230 of 2025, for the offence under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/352/85/351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and others are accused of assaulting and torturing the victim for demand of dowry.
4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.92051 of 2025(3) dt.24-02-2026 2/3 implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. Petitioner has clean antecedent.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the application of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submission of the parties and in light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273, this application for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed.
7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M., 1st Class, Dehri, Rohtas /concerned Court below in connection with Nauhatta P.S. Case No. 230 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS and with further condition that: (I). The petitioner is directed to pay a maintenance amount of Rs. 8000/- from the month of February 2026 to the complainant
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.92051 of 2025(3) dt.24-02-2026 3/3 /informant. The maintenance for the month of February 2026 shall be paid to the complainant/informant within ten days from today, and thereafter, the maintenance amount shall be paid to the complainant /informant every month before the 10th day of each month."
8. It is made clear that the order of maintenance passed by this Court shall be subject to the outcome of the maintenance case in the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court concerned, if any.
9. Needless to state that, if the petitioner fails to abide by the terms and conditions, as stated hereinabove, the State shall be at liberty to file an appropriate application, before the learned concerned Court below for cancellation of bail granted to the petitioner.
10. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Rohtas through FAX for its compliance forthwith.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) Ranjeet/- U T