Smt. Rubi Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.24706 of 2018 ====================================================== Smt. Rubi Kumari wife of Sanjeev Kumar resident of village- Dharhara, P.S.- Konch, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The Director, directorate of Intergrated Child Development Service, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Gaya.

4.

The District Programme Officer, Gaya.

5.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Tekari, Gaya.

6.

Block Development Officer, Konch Gaya.

7.

Block Agriculture Officer, Konch Gaya.

8.

The Child Development Project officer/Female Supervisor Konch Gaya. 9.

The Supervisor ICDS Panchayat Ker, Konch, Gaya. 10.

Smt. Sunita Devi wife of Sanjay Kumar Prajapat, resident of villageDharhara, P.S. - Konch Dist- Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, AC to Gp3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 28-05-2019 Matter has been listed today in the Summer Vacations as the learned Counsel for the petitioner was desirous for consideration of his case during Vacation. The slip for listing was filed pursuant to notice dated 08th May 2019, published prior to the Vacation. The matter is, accordingly taken up for consideration as both parties are present and willing to assist the Court for disposal of the matter.

Patna High Court CWJC No.24706 of 2018(2) dt.28-05-2019 2/2 The short submission made by petitioner's Counsel is that against the order passed by District Programme Officer Gaya, dated 5.7.2018, the petitioner has preferred Anganwari Appeal No. 17 of 2018, which is pending consideration before the District Magistrate, Gaya. He submits that if his appeal is disposed of the grievance of the petitioner in the instant proceeding would be satisfied.

In view of the limited submission, and since the decision has to be taken by respondent No. 3, keeping the writ petition pending would serve no useful purpose. The writ petition is disposed of. The District Magistrate, Gaya is directed to take a final decision on the petitioner's appeal in accordance with law after hearing the parties concerned expeditiously and without any undue delay. The writ petition stands disposed of.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) SNkumar/- U