← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./83662/2019bail granted

Umesh Prasad @ Umesh Yadav @ United v. The State Of Bihar

2019-12-17Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83662 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-453 Year-2019 Thana- MAKHDUMPUR District- Jehanabad ====================================================== UMESH PRASAD @ UMESH YADAV @ UNITED Son of Shri Vijay Prasad Resident of Village- Sarthua, P.S.- Makhdumpur, District- Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Birendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umeshanand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 302, 427, 379, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation is that the accused persons including the petitioner having lathi and danda in their hand came at the sweet shop of elder brother of the informant and assaulted him and scattered entire materials of the shop and committed theft of Rs.30000-35000/-. Due to assault the informant's brother sustained serious injury on his head and became unconscious and was taken to the Hospital, where the doctor declared him dead.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83662 of 2019(2) dt.17-12-2019 2/2 the petitioner is in custody since 01.11.2019 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. General and omnibus allegation of assault has been alleged against all the 18 named accused persons and 10-15 unknown. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner nor any specific injury is attributed against the petitioner. Due to previous enmity the alleged occurrence is said to have taken place. For oblique reasons the name of the petitioner has transpired in the present case.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Jehanabad in connection with Makdumpur P.S. case No.453 of 2019.

Narendra/- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T