Fattu @ Triveni Yadav @ Triveni Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90434 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-426 Year-2025 Thana- HARNAUT District- Nalanda ====================================================== Fattu @ Triveni Yadav @ Triveni Kumar Son of Vijay Yadav @ Vijay Prasad Resident of Village - Pachaura, P.S.- Harnaut, District - Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anil Kumar No. I. Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, A.P.P.
For the Informant :
Mr. Binit Kumar, Ms. Divya Kiran, Advocates ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. Prosecution case, in brief, is that on 11.09.2025 brother of the informant went to his field for work but did not return till the evening. Upon search, his dead body was recovered. Informant suspects that this petitioner along with others committed murder of the brother of informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and his name transpired during investigation. As a matter of fact, the deceased died due to electrocution and the only material that has come against
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90434 of 2025(3) dt.24-03-2026 2/2 petitioner is that he removed the dead body and put it on the fence. As per post-mortem report also, cause of death is electrocution. None of the witnesses have claimed to have seen this petitioner committing the offence. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering backdrop of the case, nature of accusation, materials available on record and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif in connection with Harnaut P. S. Case No. 426 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T