Ram Vinod Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1548 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-452 Year-2018 Thana- CIVIL LINE District- Gaya ====================================================== Ram Vinod Sharma Son of Late Sidheshwar Sharma Resident of MohallaNutan Nagar Teachers Colony, P.S.-Civil Line, District-Gaya ... Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Manoj Kumar, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 354, 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is father-in-law of the victim, has falsely been implicated in this case, as earlier also two cases of similar nature have already been filed by the informant in which the petitioner is on bail. Learned counsel submits that these cases have been filed with an intention to grab petitioner's house. Considering the facts of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Civil Lines Police Station Case No. 452 of 2018 on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1548 of 2020(2) dt.24-02-2020 2/2 properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashi/- U T