← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./90708/2025bail granted

Vivek Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-31Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90708 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-624 Year-2025 Thana- CHHATAUNI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Vivek Kumar S/O Dhruv Das R/O Vill.- Bada Bariyarpur, Ward no. 45, P.S.- Chhatauni, Dist.- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

XX W/O Rambalak Sah R/O Vill.- Bada Bariyarpur, Ward no. 45, P.S.- Chhatauni, Dist.- East Champaran.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Tarun Prasad Mandal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 31-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chhatauni P.S. Case No. 624 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 75(2), 76 and 78(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have molested the victim.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that on account of a trivial dispute regarding grazing on the field, led to hot talk between the petitioner and the informant and due to which the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90708 of 2025(4) dt.31-03-2026 2/2 present false case has been instituted against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 22.10.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 6th District& Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Exclusive Special Judge, POCSO Act, East Champaran, Motihari, Bihar/ concerned Court in connection with Chhatauni P.S. Case No. 624 of 2025.

7. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express any opinion on the merits of the case.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T