Vinay Ram @ Vinay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80644 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-185 Year-2016 Thana- PIPRA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Vinay Ram @ Vinay Kumar s/o Duryodhan Ram r/oi village Kishun Prasani PS Pipra District East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhannjay Kumar No 2 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Kalyan Shankar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Pipra P.S. Case No. 185 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of killing the daughter of the informant for non fulfillment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. It has been further submitted that petitioner never demanded dowry or subjected her to cruelty. It has been further submitted that the petitioner was in Punjab at the time of occurrence. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 30.08.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80644 of 2018(3) dt.26-02-2019 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate-Motihari, East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 185 of 2016, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U