Patna High CourtCR. MISC./84738/2019bail granted

Suman Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

2019-12-20Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84738 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-211 Year-2019 Thana- BHARGAMA District- Araria ====================================================== SUMAN KUMAR JHA Son of Ram Narayan Jha Resident of Village - Simarbanni Ward No. 6, P.S. Bhargama and Distt - Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gopal Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Shakir Ahmad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is in custody since 03.09.2019 in connection with Special Case No. 1124 of 2019 arising out of Bhargama P.S. Case No. 211 of 2019 for the offence registered under Sections 272 and 273/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged recoveries were not from the conscious possession of the petitioner and he has one other criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2nd

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84738 of 2019(2) dt.20-12-2019 2/2 Additional Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, Araria in connection with Special Case No. 1124 of 2019 arising out of Bhargama P.S. Case No. 211 of 2019, subject to the following conditions :-

1. One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, son, brother, sister and/or his wife.

2. The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

3. The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

4. The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Jagdish/- U T