Puja Bharti v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.41164 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -294 Year- 2017 Thana -KOTWALI District- MUNGER ====================================================== Puja Bharti, wife of Dhruv Kumar Singh @ Dhruv Mandal, resident of village- Tikarampur, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Munger. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kishore Thakur, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 16-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in Kotwali P.S. Case No. 294 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 337, 438, 379, 307, 427, 436, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is lady having clean antecedent. It is not possible that in a gathering of 40-50 persons, the petitioner who is lady will make firing. It is mentioned in the written report that nobody has sustained injury.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41164 of 2018 (2) dt.16-07-2018 2/2 weeks from today, in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 294 of 2017, she shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and her absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel her bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- Rohit Kr.
U T