Ramrati Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91451 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-536 Year-2025 Thana- CHANDI District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1.
Ramrati Devi W/o Chandrika Paswan Resident of Vill.- Yashwantpur, P.SChandi,Dist- Nalanda,Bihar 2.
Pinki Devi W/O Dharamvir Paswan R/O Vill.- Yashwantpur, P.S- Chandi, Dist- Nalanda, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Niraj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-01-2026 Heard Mr. Niraj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioners seeks bail, who are in custody since 19.09.2025 in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 536 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 18.09.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 109(1) and 103(1) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. According to prosecution case, petitioners and other co-accused persons are alleged to have armed with lathi, danda, abused and assaulted the informant and his father, namely, Baleshwar Prasad. Due to assault, informant's father sustained
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91451 of 2025(2) dt.13-01-2026 2/3 severe injuries and died in front of the shop.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have clean antecedent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case. Although, the petitioners are named in the F.I.R. but from perusal of the F.I.R, it appears that there is no specific allegation of assault or overt act against the petitioners rather the allegation are general and omnibus in nature. Petitioners are ladies. Police after investigation, submitted charge-sheet against the petitioners and the petitioners are in custody since 19.09.2025.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, petitioners have clean antecedent, there is no specific allegation of assault or overt act against the petitioners, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-1, Hilsa, District- Nalanda in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 536 of 2025, corresponding to G.R. No. 2879/2025 with the following conditions:
i. Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91451 of 2025(2) dt.13-01-2026 3/3 properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioners tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ranjeet/- U T