Vishwaroop Singh @ Vishwarup Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88886 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-287 Year-2025 Thana- PAKRIDAYAL District- East Champaran ====================================================== Vishwaroop Singh @ Vishwarup Singh S/O Late Shrijeet Singh R/O Chaita, P.S- Karidayal, Distt.- East Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rahul Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-01-2026 Heard Mr. Rahul Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Pakridayal P.S. Case No. 287 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 15.06.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 125(a), 329(3), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.
3. As per the First Information Report, the informant alleged that when he was getting his land measured, during the course, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons arrived and assaulted him by means of iron rod.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88886 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026 2/3 present case. The petitioner and informant are agnates to each other and there is case and counter case and one civil suit is pending between the parties. Although there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he has assaulted the informant and the informant received injury but the injury report of the informant suggest that injury inflicted upon him is simple in nature
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and apart from that the petitioner carries four criminal antecedents other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of paragraph-3 of the bail application that out of the four cases, the petitioner is on bail in three matters and acquitted in one.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., 8th, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Pakridayal P.S. Case No. 287 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88886 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026 3/3 Procedure / Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and with other following conditions:- i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bond in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Suruchi/- U T