Chhatradhari Yadav @ Hari Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.44686 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -212 Year- 2014 Thana -AKBARPUR District- NAWADA ======================================================
1. Chhatradhari Yadav @ Hari Yadav, Son of Late Musafir Yadav, Resident of Village- Paijuna, Police Station- Akbarpur, District- Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rabi Bhushan Prasad No. 1,Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Pronati Singh,A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Akbarpur P.S.Case No. 212 of 2014, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 324, 307, 342 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 Arms Act. As per F.I.R. allegation is that one another coaccused fired from illegal country made rifle, which hit on right arm of the informant and when he fell down on the ground, the petitioner assaulted him with Garasa on the head of the informant, causing injuries.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is allegation of assault by sword to the informant but injuries are to be simple in nature and he is in custody since
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44686 of 2018 (3) dt.05-09-2018 2/2 07.06.2018.
Heard learned A.P.P also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- ( Rupees Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Nawada in connection with Akbarpur P.S.Case No. 212 of 2014, subject to the following conditions:- i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
iii) It is made clear that if petitioner found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T