Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46602/2018bail granted

Sita Ram @ Ranjit Yadav @ Sita Ram Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-08-25Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46602 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -112 Year- 2018 Thana -MEERGANJ District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. SITA RAM @ RANJIT YADAV @ SITA RAM KUMAR S/o Sushil Yadav, R/o Vill.- Soureji, P.S.- Mirganj, District- Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhramveer For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Veena Kumari Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 25-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Mirganj P.S. Case No. 112/2018, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 436 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has been implicated in this case due to previous land dispute. In the written report, there is no any specific allegation against this petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Mirganj P.S. Case No.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46602 of 2018 (2) dt.25-08-2018 2/2 112/2018, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. XVI, Gopalganj, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J.) Rakhi U T