Jatta Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90764 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-117 Year-2025 Thana- SANDESH District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Jatta Singh Son of Kamal Singh @ Kamla Singh Resident of village - Dihari, P.S.- Sandesh, District - Bhojpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shiv Prasad Gupta, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-01-2026 Heard Mr. Shiv Prasad Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 29.10.2025 in connection with Sandesh P.S. Case No. 117 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 23.05.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115, 332(c), 109 and 352 of the BNS, 2023.
3. According to prosecution case, all the accused persons including this petitioner have assaulted to the informant's uncle due to which he received injury.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90764 of 2025(2) dt.13-01-2026 2/3 F.I.R is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. There is case and counter case between the parties. There is allegation against the petitioner that he has assaulted to the informant's uncle, namely, Sajan Singh on his head by means of iron rod due to which he has received injury and the injury report of the injured person suggest that the injury is grievous in nature. He further submits that due to admitted land dispute the present occurrence has taken place. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 29.10.2025.
5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances that the petitioner has clean antecedent and there is case and counter case between the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Sandesh P.S. Case No. 117 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:- i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90764 of 2025(2) dt.13-01-2026 3/3 properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/- U T