← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./85705/2019allowed

Chandan Kumar Mehta @ Chandan Mehta v. The State Of Bihar

2020-06-04Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85705 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2019 Thana- SHRI NAGAR District- Madhepura ====================================================== Chandan Kumar Mehta @ Chandan Mehta Son of Narayan Mehta Resident of Village- Laxmipur, Bhagwati Ward No. 11, Mehta Tola, P.S.- Shrinagar, District- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 82461 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2019 Thana- SHRI NAGAR District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1.

Shiv Shankar Mehta @ Shivnarayan Mehta Son of Late Asarfi Mehta Resident of Village - Laxmipur, Bhagwati Ward No. 11 (Mehta Tola), P.S.- Srinagar, District- Madhepura 2.

Mantu Mehta Son of Late Bhumi Mehta Resident of Village - Laxmipur, Bhagwati Ward No. 11 (Mehta Tola), P.S.- Srinagar, District- Madhepura 3.

Tuntun Mehta Son of Late Bhumi Mehta Resident of Village - Laxmipur, Bhagwati Ward No. 11 (Mehta Tola), P.S.- Srinagar, District- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 85705 of 2019) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rabindra Kumar (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 82461 of 2019) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bam Bahadur Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 04-06-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

2. Petitioners are in custody in connection with Shrinagar P.S. Case No. 44 of 2019 for the offence under sections 147, 148, 149. 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegation against these petitioners is that they

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85705 of 2019(5) dt.04-06-2020 2/2 entered the house of the informant and assaulted the father of the informant due to land dispute.

3. The petitioner of Cr. Misc. No. 85705 of 2019 is in custody since 1.8.2019 having no criminal antecedent similarly the petitioners in Cr. Misc. No. 82461 of 2019 are in custody since 1.8.2019 having no criminal antecedent. Considering the fact that there was land dispute and on account of land dispute, scuffle took place, the Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners, let the petitioners, in both the cases named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Madhepura, in connection with Shrinagar P.S. Case No. 44 of 2019. The trial court is however directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same in all respect within seven months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and if any delay in early conclusion of the trial is found on the part of the petitioners, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U T