Mahanand Roy And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24511 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -156 Year- 2017 Thana -BAUNSI District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. Mahanand Roy Son of Late Jhari Lal Roy

2. Gajanand Roy @ Gayanand Roy Son of Late Jhari Lal Roy

3. Binay Roy @ Vinay Roy Son of Mahanand Roy

4. Ajay Roy Son of Mahanand Roy

5. Raj Kumar Roy Son of Mahanand Roy All residents of Village - Gunwanti, Ward No. 07, P.S. - Bounsi, District - Araria, Bihar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Ravish For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Parmanand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-05-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Bausi P.S. Case No. 156 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 308, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is of assault to the informant and others by different weapons causing injuries to them.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there is case and counter case between the parties and except one injury, which was caused to the informant on his hand all other injuries are simple in nature.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24511 of 2018 (3) dt.18-05-2018 2/2 surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM - VI, Araria, in connection with Bausi P.S. Case No. 156 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, as well as subject to the following conditions, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T