Nitya Nand Singh v. Amrendra Kumar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1652 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.24584 of 2019 ====================================================== Nitya Nand Singh Son of Sri Bhagwan Singh resident of villageKhankalipur, @ Khankulipur, P.S.and District- Arwal. At present Ward Councilor of Ward No. 9 of Nagar Parishad Arwal, Arwal. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

Amrendra Kumar Son of Late Bhagwati Prasad Sah, Resident of VillageArwal Sipah, P.S. and District-Arwal 2.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Director, Urban Development and Housingh Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

The District Magistrate, Arwal, District-Arwal. 6.

The Executive Officer, Nagar Parishand, Arwa, District-Arwal. 7.

The State Election Commission (Municipality) through the Secretary, 4th Floor Sone Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Ranjeet Chaubey, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Yogendra Prasad Sinha (AAG-7) :

Mr. Shankar Kumar, AC to AAG-7 For SEC :

Mr. Amit Srivastava, Advocate :

Mr. Girish Pandey, Advocate For respondent no. 6 :

Mr. Sanjeev Nikesh, Advocate :

Mr. Manish Kumar No. 2, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 17-03-2021 Present Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred against the order dated 10.12.2019 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 24584 of 2019.

Patna High Court L.P.A No.1652 of 2019 dt.17-03-2021 2/2 In view of the intervening developments, and as so pointed out by the learned counsel for the appellant, the present appeal has become infructuous, and as such, as prayed for, disposed of.

All questions of law and facts stand opened.

Similarly, we are satisfied with the contents of para 12 of the impugned judgment. As such, no order is required to be passed with regard to the observations made there. The Letters Patent Appeal Stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) veena/rajivAFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 20.03.2021 Transmission Date NA