Ambuj Kumar Pandey v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3273 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.
Ambuj Kumar Pandey, son of Sri Shivnath Pandey, resident of VillageRasalpur, P.S.- Kutumba and District- Aurangabad (Bihar). 2.
Balvendra Kumar, son of Sri Devendra Mishra, resident of Village- Shahpur Akhada, P.S.- Aurangabad Town and District- Aurangabad (Bihar). 3.
Sunil Kumar, son of Sri Jalakdeo Ram, resident of Village- Sinduar, P.S.- Daudnagar and District- Aurangabad (Bihar).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of personal and Reform, Patna.
2.
The Additional Chief Secretary cum Principal Secretary, Department of Registration, Excise, Prohibition and Production Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Registrar General, Department of Registration Government of Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Assistant Registrar General cum Secretary, Bihar Society for Computerisation of Registration Offices (BISCORE), Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5.
The District Magistrate cum District Registrar, Aurangabad. 6.
The Assistant Registrar General, Magadh Division, Gaya Cum District SCORE.
7.
The Deputy Collector (ESTD), Established Section, Aurangabad. 8.
The District Sub Registrar, Aurangabad cum Secretary Bihar Society for Computerisation of Registration Offices (BISCORE), Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 9.
The BPSM, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Vikash Kumar (Sc11) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 21-12-2023 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners, however counsel for the State is present.
2. It transpires to this Court that vide order no.3 dated 08.12.2023, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners and the
Patna High Court CWJC No.3273 of 2020(4) dt.21-12-2023 2/2 matter was adjourned for one week as a matter of last indulgence.
3. It transpires to this Court that the petitioners are not interested to pursue this case and therefore, this writ petition is hereby dismissed due to non prosecution.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Divyansh/- U