Patna High CourtCR. MISC./85393/2019bail granted

Mantosh Kumar @ Mantosh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2020-01-07Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85393 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-272 Year-2019 Thana- NAUTAN District- West Champaran ====================================================== Mantosh Kumar @ Mantosh Yadav, 21 years, Male, Son of Sri Chhathu Sah, Resident of Village- Arnahawa, Chanayan Bandh, P.S.- Majhaulia, DistrictWest Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Naresh Ray (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 413, 414, 467, 468, 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)a, 26/35 of the Arms Act.

Allegation against petitioner is recovery of stolen motorcycle from his possession along with three other accused persons.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. There is no recovery of any arms

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85393 of 2019(2) dt.07-01-2020 2/2 and ammunition from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 10.07.2019. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1st, West Champaran at Bettiah, in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 272 of 2019, subject to conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T