Ravindra Singh @ Bhonu Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40968 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -218 Year- 2011 Thana -VAISHALI District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Ravindra Singh @ Bhonu Singh, S/o Late Herdeo Singh, R/o Vill.- Jarang Rampur, P.S.- Vaishali (Belsar O.P.), District- Vaishali.

2. Shobha Devi W/o Ravindra Singh, R/o Vill.- Jarang Rampur, P.S.- Vaishali (Belsar O.P.) District- Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Barun Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ramchandra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-07-2018 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Vaishali (Belsar O.P.) Police Station Case No. 218 of 2011, disclosing offences under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioners are father and mother of the deceased and allegation against them and others is of killing the deceased and the case is of year 2011.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that they are own father and mother of the deceased and have been made accused in this case only on the basis of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40968 of 2018 (2) dt.16-07-2018 2/2 suspicion and except suspicion, there is nothing against them and other co-accused of this case has already been granted the privilege of bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 10.02.2014 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 38711 of 2014.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the conduct of the petitioner that the case is of the year 2011 and the petitioners have come for grant of anticipatory bail in the year 2018, I am not inclined to grant them the privilege of anticipatory bail rather this application is disposed of with direction to the petitioners to surrender before the court below and pray for regular bail and if any such application is filed, the court below after considering the fact that other co-accused has been enlarged on bail and also after considering other materials available on record, shall dispose of the prayer for bail of the petitioners, if possible on same day, without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.