Kulkul Yadav @ Kulanand Yadav@Kulanand Kusiyait v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.47557 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -51 Year- 2017 Thana -RATANPURA District- SUPAUL ====================================================== KULKUL YADAV @ KULANAND YADAV @ KULANAND KUSIYAIT, S/o Late Nathan Kushiyait, R/o Dahgama, P.S.- Karjian, District- Supaul.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 241.8 liters wine is said to have been recovered.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. It is alleged that total 241.8 liters wine is recovered from two Bicycles of co-accused Ranju Mehta @ Ranjeet Mehta and Sadanand Sada. The name of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47557 of 2018 (2) dt.03-08-2018 2/2 the petitioner has come in the present case on the basis of disclosure made by co-accused Ranju Mehta @ Ranjeet Mehta. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ Complaint Case.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.D.J.-IInd-cum-Special Judge, (Excise), Supaul, in connection with S.T. Eccise1003/2017, arising out of Ratanpura P.S. Case No. 51/17, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U