Bhim Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86055 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-320 Year-2019 Thana- KONCH District- Gaya ====================================================== Bhim Chaudhary, aged about 25 years, Son of Moti Chaudhary Resident of Village-Dharahra, Police Station-Konch, District-Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Konch P.S. Case No. 320 of 2019 registered for offences under sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

As per prosecution case, on receipt of secret information, the police made raid at the place of occurrence from where the police recovered total 12 litres of desi wine. On seeing the police, the petitioner fled away from the place of occurrence.

The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Looking to the quantity of liquor recovered as also the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86055 of 2019(2) dt.18-02-2020 2/2 above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Gaya in connection with Konch P.S. Case No. 320 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled. It is also made clear that if the petitioner is repeats the similar offence in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of the bail.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T