Anand Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89351 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-466 Year-2025 Thana- RUPASPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Anand Kumar S/o Arun Paswan R/o Village- Rukanpur, P.S- Rupaspur, DistPatna, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Saket Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 304 of the B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the mobile of the informant was snatched by unknown miscreants.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that during investigation, one Vishal Kumar was apprehended and he has given his confessional statement and in his confessional statement, he has named this petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Save and except

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89351 of 2025(2) dt.16-01-2026 2/2 the confessional statement of co-accused, there is nothing against him. It has further been submitted that from whose possession, mobile has been recovered, has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 11.12.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 83854 of 2025. The case of this petitioner stands on better footing. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 07.08.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 466 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Danapur/Concerned Court.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) shubham/- U T