Abhishek Singh @ Abhishek Kumar Singh @ Abhishek Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90000 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-621 Year-2024 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== Abhishek Singh @ Abhishek Kumar Singh @ Abhishek Kumar S/O Manoranjan Singh @ Munna Singh R/O Village- Sandha Khemaji Tola, Police station- Chapra Muffsill, District- Saran, Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 16-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and perused the case diary.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 621 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, three unknown miscreants on the point of pistol looted articles from the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90000 of 2025(2) dt.16-01-2026 2/3 the petitioner also submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. Name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of confessional statement made by co-accused, namely, Rahul Kumar Vishwakarma and the same has got no evidentiary value. It is further submitted that no recovery of looted articles have been made from the possession of the petitioner. No T.I. parade has been conducted in this case. The petitioner is in custody since 24.02.2025 and has got ten criminal antecedents.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 621 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90000 of 2025(2) dt.16-01-2026 3/3 (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(III) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(IV) If the petitioner is found involved in the similar nature of offence in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T