← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./89839/2025bail granted

Mukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-07Mr. Justice Sourendra Pandey4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89839 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2025 Thana- Lakho District- Begusarai ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar S/o Ramanand Yadav R/o Village - Bharrahi (Naya Bazar Ward No. 2, Nagar Parishad), P.S - Saharsa, District - Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhirendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Pronoti Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 07-01-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Lakho P.S. Case No. 200 of 2025 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 30(a) and 32(i)(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, a total of 666 litres of foreign liquor was recovered from the carrier of a tractor, which was found concealed under stone-chips.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was merely the driver of the tractor and had no concern whatsoever with the recovered liquor. It is further submitted that no incriminating article was recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and that he was merely apprehended because he happens to

2/4 be the driver of the tractor. The learned counsel lastly submits that the petitioner has four criminal antecedents and he is in custody since 28.09.2025.

5. The petitioner is willing and undertakes to deposit a sum of Rs. 5,000/- with the Advocate Association, Patna High Court.

6. The learned A.P.P. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

7. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that the petitioner has remained in custody since 28.09.2025, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection Lakho P.S. Case No. 200 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his close relative and the other shall be the local resident. (ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each date of the trial.

3/4 (iii) In case of absence on two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned. (iv) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence in future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bond. (v) The learned Court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(vi) In view of the antecedents of the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Begusarai within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every two weeks thereafter for the next nine months.

4/4 concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the petitioner before the court concerned.

8. The bail bond of the petitioner shall be accepted by the learned Trial Court on showing receipt of deposit of aforesaid amount with the Advocate Association, Patna High Court.

9. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is allowed.

10. It is made clear that the observation, if any, made in this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial. (Sourendra Pandey, J) aditya/- U T