← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/889/2020disposed

Bhagwan Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2020-02-14Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 889 of 2020 ====================================================== Bhagwan Prasad Singh Son of late Baijnath Prasad Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Nariyar Road, Naya Bazar, Ward No. 3, Saharsa, P.S. and DistrictSaharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Engineer -in- Chief, Department of Water Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Chief Engineer, Irrigation Construction, Department of Water Resources Dehri.

4.

The Executive Engineer, Sone Canal Division, Ara. 5.

The Executive Engineer, Koshi Project, Saharsa 6.

The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the S t a t e :

Mr.Vikash Kumar (Sc11) For Accountant General :

Mr Ram Yash Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 14-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to grant of benefits under the Assured Career Progression Scheme. Petitioner's claim is based on the fact that he continued to discharge his duties as Irrigation Revenue Inspector throughout his services without any promotion.

Learned State Counsel submits that the petitioner was

Patna High Court CWJC No.889 of 2020(2) dt.14-02-2020 2/2 required to approach the Chief Engineer (Respondent No 3) for such benefit.

Being faced with such submission, petitioner's counsel submits that the petitioner would approach Respondent No 3 with a detailed representation containing all details in support of his claim.

If such representation is filed within four weeks, Respondent No 3 is directed to dispose of the same in accordance with law by reasoned and speaking order, and if dues are found admissible, the same shall also be paid within a period of three months.

Writ petition stands disposed of.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- U