← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16446/2018dismissed

Nilima Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-29Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16446 of 2018 ====================================================== Nilima Kumari, Wife of Mahesh Kumar, Resident of Flat No.42, Block-A, Ashoka Palace, Exhibition Road, Police Station- Gandhi Maidan, DistrictPatna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Bihar Public Service Commission through its Chairman, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Bailey Road, Patna.

4. The Secretary, Bihar Public Service Commission, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Bailey Road, Patna.

5. The Joint Secretary cum Examination Controller, Bihar Public Service Commission, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Bailey Road, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. J.S. Arora, Adv.

For the BPSC : Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Adv. For the State :

Mr. Utsav Kumar, AC to GA4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 29-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

In this writ application, the petitioner has raised a grievance the upper limit of age for the O.B.C. (Female) should be extended from 40 to 43 at par with the candidates of SC and ST category.

The State Government under the reservation policy has fixed different dates providing the upper age limit for different categories of people like for Unreserved category, the upper age limit is 37, for O.B.C., is 40 and for SC/ST, the upper age limit is

42. The petitioner belongs to O.B.C. though may be female. So,

Patna High Court CWJC No.16446 of 2018 dt.29-08-2018 2/2 the upper age limit applicable to male is equally applicable to the female, inasmuch as, fixation of upper age limit for different categories of people lies within the domain of executive and thus, this Court does not find any merit in this writ petition. Accordingly, this application is rejected.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 31.08.2018 Transmission Date NA