Babu Saheb v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89481 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-380 Year-2025 Thana- SHEOHAR District- Sheohar ====================================================== Babu Saheb, S/o Pramod Ray, R/o vill - Pakadi, P.S.- Piprahi, Distt.- Sheohar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vikash Khanna, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 15-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Sheohar P.S. Case No.380 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 317(5), 338, 336(3) AND 340(2) of B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner along with one Niraj Kumar were on a bike and were intercepted by the police. The petitioner could not furnish the documents regarding the bike. With the help of HHD machine, it was disclosed that the bike is stolen one and the owner of the bike is Keshav Kumar.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89481 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/2 committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He is not concerned in any way with the bike. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. Police has not complied Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. while making the seizure. It has also been submitted that this case is triable by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 11.10.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar in connection with Sheohar P.S. Case No. 380 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T