Sadanand Mehta @ Sadand Mehta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86057 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2018 Thana- PIPRA District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

SADANAND MEHTA @ SADAND MEHTA, aged about 53 years, Male, S/o Late Jagdish Mehta.

2.

Vidhyanand Mehta, aged about 51 years, Male, S/o Late Jagdish Mehta. 3.

Jagdish Mehta, aged about 72 years, Male, s/o Late Nathan Mehta. 4.

Ramesh Mehta @ Ramesh Kumar Raman, aged about 40 years, Male, son of late Jagdish Mehta.

All are resident of Village- Bishanpur, P.S.- Pipra, Distt- Supaul. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 39 of 2018, registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 354(B), 448, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. It appears that the petitioners have already been granted Police bail, in such view of the matter, this anticipatory bail application of these petitioners is not maintainable. Let the petitioners surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from today and pray for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86057 of 2019(2) dt.18-02-2020 2/2 regular bail, the Court below will consider the same in light of the ratio laid down in the case of Mahendra Prasad Singh vs. the State of Bihar reported in 2004(3) PLJR 491 and pass appropriate order, if the petitioners have not misused the privileged of Police bail.

Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U T