Patna High CourtCR. MISC./84129/2019bail granted

Vikram Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2020-03-17Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84129 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2019 Thana- BELA INDUSTRIAL DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== VIKRAM KUMAR Son of Bharat Paswan Resident of Village- Bela Chhapada, P.S.- Bela, Distt- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anant Kumar 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 17-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 30.09.2019 in connection with Bela P.S. Case No. 39 of 2019 for the alleged offences under Section 307 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code including Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the FIR, even though he is an employee of the informant. The thrust of the accusation of firing upon the informant is attributed to the co-accused Vivek Choudhary in the backdrop of the past dispute with him.

4. Learned APP appears and has been heard. He has however not pointed to any objective material in the case diary alleged against the petitioner.

5. Be that as it may, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84129 of 2019(3) dt.17-03-2020 2/2 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Aftab Alam, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur (East), in connection with Bela P.S. Case No. 39 of 2019, on the following conditions-- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) HR/- U T