Manoj Sharma @ Manoj Vishwakarma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91591 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2025 Thana- AGRER District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.
Manoj Sharma @ Manoj Vishwakarma S/o Late Shambhu Sharma @ Shambhu Vishwakarma Resident of Village - Kudhanu, P.S - Agarer, District - Rohtas 2.
Varun Singh @ Varun Kumar S/o Rajendra Singh @ Rajendra Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Kudhanu, P.S - Agarer, District - Rohtas 3.
Dipak Singh @ Dipak Kumar @ Dipak Kumar Singh S/o Rajendra Singh @ Rajendra Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Kudhanu, P.S - Agarer, District - Rohtas 4.
Prakash Singh @ Prakash Kumar Singh S/o Ramadhar Singh Resident of Village - Kudhanu, P.S - Agarer, District - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, A.P.P.
For the Informant :
Mr. Rabindra Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-01-2026 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application with regard to petitioner no. 2 as he has already been arrested during pendency of the case.
2. Permission is granted.
3. This anticipatory bail application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with regard to petitioner no. 2.
4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91591 of 2025(2) dt.19-01-2026 2/2
5. Petitioner nos. 1, 3, 4 apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 329(3), 308(2), 308(3), 352, 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
6. As per prosecution case, these petitioners along with other accused persons stopped informant from ploughing his field, verbally abused him, demanded Rs. 50 lacs as extortion and threatened to kill informant if he steps on the field without paying the extortion amount. Petitioner no. 1 has got three criminal antecedents and petitioner nos. 3 & 4 have got two criminal antecedents each.
7. Considering the nature of accusation and criminal antecedents, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is refused.
8. This anticipatory bail application is, accordingly, disposed of.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T