Patna High CourtCR. MISC./67825/2018bail granted

Polu Kahar @ Mithlesh v. The State Of Bihar

2018-11-27Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.67825 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2018 Thana- HATHIDAH District- Patna ====================================================== POLU KAHAR @ MITHLESH son of Late Umesh Ram, Resident of Village- Aunta, Behind Kali Asthan, P.S.- Hathida, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gouranga Chatterjee, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Matloob Rab, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 27-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in Hathida P.S. Case No. 05/2018, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a and 26 of the Arms Act.

It is alleged that one country-made pistol and one live cartridge was recovered from possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is in custody since 03.02.2018.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and period of custody, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner above-named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.67825 of 2018(2) dt.27-11-2018 2/2 Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-cum-Sub-Judge 4th, Barh, Patna in connection with Hathida P.S. Case No. 05/2018, subject to the following conditions :- (i) Both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner shall be present on each and every date fixed by the Court and absence on two consecutive dates without valid reason will result in cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

(iii) If petitioner tamper with the evidence in the case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) vinita/- U T