Sintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90169 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-468 Year-2025 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

Sintu Kumar Son of Chhotelal Mehta Resident of Village - Chaughara (Ward No.- 7) Hardi Purab, P.S.- Supaul, District - Supaul 2.

Mani Prakash Kumar Son of Chhotelal Mehta Resident of Village - Chaughara (Ward No.- 7) Hardi Purab, P.S.- Supaul, District - Supaul 3.

Chhotelal Mehta Son of Nakchhedi Mehta Resident of Village - Chaughara (Ward No.- 7) Hardi Purab, P.S.- Supaul, District - Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rabindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 15-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Supaul P.S. Case no.468 of 2025 registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352 and 3(5) of B.N.S, 2023.

3. Allegations in the F.I.R is that accused persons including the petitioners herein came variously armed and indulged in assaulting the informant and others causing injuries to them.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that allegations made in the F.I.R would make it clear that while

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90169 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/3 petitioner no.3 is an order giver, petitioner no.1 has been imputed with general and omnibus allegation of assault and only with regard to petitioner no.2, there is allegation of assaulting the informant's wife, however, injury report of said Urmila Devi would show that injury in the form of laceration which is a simple injury caused by hard and blunt object. There is delay of four days in lodging of F.I.R, for which no explanation has been tendered. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent and undertake to co-operate in investigation/trial.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and also considering that there is delay in lodging of F.I.R and injuries sustained by the informant's wife are simple in nature caused by hard and blunt object, it is directed that the petitioners, above named having no criminal antecedent in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Supaul P.S. Case no.468 of 2025 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90169 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 3/3 where the case is pending/successor Court, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023. (Soni Shrivastava, J) Harsh/- U T