← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1351/2020dismissed

Sudhesh Kumar v. The Bihar Staff Selection Commission

2023-07-25Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1351 of 2020 ====================================================== Sudhesh Kumar S/o Sri Ram Swarup Prasad Yadav, resident of Flat No. 303, Shyama Apartment, Anandgarh Colony, Tilkamanjhi, P.s.- Anandgardh Colony, Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Bihar Staff Selection Commission through its Chairman, Veterinary College campus, Sheikpura, Patna-1 2.

The Chairman, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College campus, Sheikpura, Patna-1 3.

The State of Bihar through the General Administration Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ankit Katriar, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Saroj Kr. Sharma AC to AAG-3 For the BSSC :

Mr. Rana Vikram Singh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 25-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Bihar Staff Selection Commission (for short 'BSSC') and learned counsel for the State.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by his non -selection as a City Manager. He has participated in the process undertaken pursuant to Advertisement No 21010116.

3. The submission is that in the written tests, the petitioner had obtained 25.55 out of 70 marks.

4. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. After filing of counter affidavit, placing on record Resolution dated 16.07.2007 of the Govt. of

Patna High Court CWJC No.1351 of 2020(5) dt.25-07-2023 2/2 Bihar in the Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department (Annexure-A to the counter affidavit), it is apparent that the cutoff marks for the backward class category, of which the petitioner is a member, was 36.5%. The petitioner, admittedly is having less than cut-off marks. Thus, in the opinion of this Court, petitioner can have no grievance about his non- inclusion in the select list.

5. The writ application is, therefore, devoid of merit and dismissed.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) shyambihari/- U