Deo Kishor Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.935 of 2020 ====================================================== Deo Kishor Singh, S/o Chondrama Singh, Resident of Village + P.O. - Fuha, P.S.- Barhara, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar. 2.
The Principal Secretary, Mines and Geology Deptt., Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.
The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 4.
The District Magistrate, Bhojpur.
5.
Superintendent of Police, Bhojpur, Ara.
6.
Sub- Divisional Officer, Bhojpur, Ara.
7.
S.H.O., Koilwar.
8.
S.H.O., Barhara.
9.
Directorate, Broadpan Company Ltd., Koilwar.
10.
Pramod Kr. Singh, S/o Late Ram Babu Singh.
11.
Ranjay Kr. Singh, S/o Nageshwar Singh.
12.
Mukesh Kumar Singh, S/o Late Rajeshwar Singh All R/o Village + P.O.- Fuha, P.S.- Barhara, Distt.- Bhojpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pranav Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Gyan Prakash Ojha (Ga7) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 16-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
Petitioner has prayed for the following relief/s: "For issuance of an appropriate writ/order or direction to the respondents to take action against the official respondents for not taking action against the private respondents who illegally collecting money on the illegal check post from the vehicles and creating problems for the public on Ara Chhapra road and for grant of all consequential benefits."
Patna High Court CWJC No.935 of 2020(2) dt.16-01-2020 2/2 After the matter was heard for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner shall be content if a direction is issued to the concerned respondents to consider and decide the representation, which the petitioner shall be making afresh within a period of four weeks from today. Learned counsel for the State states that upon receipt of such request, if any, the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law, expeditiously and positively within a period of three months from the date of receipt thereof. Equally, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such alternative remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law.
We are hopeful that as and when petitioner takes recourse to such remedies, as are otherwise available in law, before the appropriate forum, the same shall be dealt with, in accordance with law and with reasonable dispatch. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uday/- U