Dukhi Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89800 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-271 Year-2025 Thana- SINGHWARA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Dukhi Yadav S/o- Ram Briksh Yadav @ Rambrichh Yadav R/o village - Kerwa, kerba , P.s- Saharghat , District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate Mr. Udeshya Kumar Yadav, Advocate Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 15-01-2026 Heard Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Singhwara P.S. Case No. 271 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 338, 336(3), 323, 111(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that co-accused namely, Raja Kumar and Chhotu Kumar were apprehended with stolen bikes, and they disclosed that since the house of this petitioner is near Nepal, they used to keep the stolen bikes and mobiles at the house of this petitioner.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89800 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/2 has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the house of the petitioner was raided and nothing was recovered from him. He also submits that the petitioner has been made an accused in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused namely, Raja Kumar and Chhotu but not of similar in nature. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 03.10.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of five cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-VII, Madhubani in connection with Singhwara P.S. Case No. 271 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T