Vivek Kumar @ Vinod Rai @ Vinod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.571 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-513 Year-2025 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ====================================================== Vivek Kumar @ Vinod Rai @ Vinod Kumar S/O Late Lal Das Rai @ Late Lalas Rai Resident of Village- Garkha, Police Station- Garkha, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mohammed Arif, A.P.P.
For the Informant :
Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State.
2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 76, 303(2), 324(4), 324(5), 352, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. Prosecution case, in brief, is that on 07.07.2025 at about 6:10 PM, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, gathered on Khatiyani land of the informant and started construction work inspite of proceeding under Section 163 BNSS against the accused persons. On objection, accused persons abused informant and assaulted her by means of lathi, danda, bricks, stones.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.571 of 2026(2) dt.10-02-2026 2/2
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and there is no allegation of specific overt act against petitioner. Injuries sustained by the injured are simple in nature. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering backdrop of the case, nature of accusation, injury and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Garkha P. S. Case No. 513 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T