Sunny Ansari @ Sanny Ansari @ Sanni Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2107 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-609 Year-2018 Thana- KUDHNI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Sunny Ansari @ Sanny Ansari @ Sanni Ansari, aged about 25 years, Male, Son of Md. Munna Ansari @ Istaque Ansari, Resident of Village- Harpur Parsa, P.S.- Parsa, District- Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Lalan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 05-06-2020 Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Lalan Kumar, the learned Additional P.P. for the State through video conferencing.

The petitioner seeks bail in Kudhani (Turki O.P.) P.S. Case No.609 of 2018, registered under Sections 399, 402 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 25(1-b)a/26/35 of the Arms Act.

The police raided the place after having received information that many criminals had assembled to commit cognizable offence and arrested the petitioner. From possession of the petitioner arms and ammunitions were recovered. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected vide order dated 21.05.2019 on the ground besides the recovery of arms and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2107 of 2020(2) dt.05-06-2020 2/3 ammunitions that the petitioner is an accused in nine other criminal cases. The petitioner again filed this petition and the father of the petitioner sworn affidavit but in para 3 of the bail petition, father of the petitioner states that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Thereafter the father of the petitioner filed supplementary affidavit disclosing the fact that the petitioner is accused in nine criminal cases.

From perusal of the description of the criminal cases, it appears that most of the cases are very heinous in nature. Even the petitioner is an accused in cases registered under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Arms Act.

Taking into consideration the facts and the fact that the petitioner has got criminal antecedents and the petitioner is made accused in nine other criminal cases registered under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Arms Act, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

The trial court is directed to hold the trial on day to day basis and conclude the same within six months from the date of receipt of this order.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur is directed to ensure the attendance of the prosecution witnesses in the trial court so that the trial must be concluded within six

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2107 of 2020(2) dt.05-06-2020 3/3 months.

If the trial is not concluded within six months, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

Let a copy of this order be sent to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur and the trial court for information and needful.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) S.KUMAR/- U T