Chichai Dom v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91542 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-408 Year-2025 Thana- BIHARIGANJ District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1.
Chichai Dom Son of Late Karpuri Dom R/o Village - Gamali, Ward no. 2, P.S. - Bihariganj, Dist. - Madhepura.
2.
Rahul Kumar Son of Chichai Dom R/o Village - Gamali, Ward no. 2, P.S. - Bihariganj, Dist. - Madhepura.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Alok Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ajit Kumar, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 126(2), 76, 324(2), 325, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. The allegation against these petitioners is of causing assault to the informant and her son along with other accused persons, besides the allegation of snatching of valuables and damaging the household articles.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that altogether 19 persons, including these petitioners, are alleged to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91542 of 2025(2) dt.19-01-2026 2/2 have committed the offence. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and there is no specific allegation of any overt act against these petitioners. It is further submitted that similarly situated co-accused, namely, Pintu Dom has already been granted anticipatory bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 06.01.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 83876 of 2025. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the general and omnibus accusation and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate-I, Udakishunganj, Madhepura in connection with Bihariganj P. S. Case No. 408 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T